Add seats for admins and members who already have an account.
Maintain Trust and Integrity at Scale.
The fear
A grading gap between departments, or an integrity scare with no shared record, is how a programme loses trust. Separate tools and private scales make the appeal harder to explain.
The resolution
Acadomic is one formative QA layer for the faculty: the same rubric notes, AI-use and plagiarism signals, and a credit pool you can size. Cohort insights do not name a learner, and they are not a finding sent to a panel.
Insights show the pattern, not a named student.
Credit pools and seat counts are quoted for your programme — not a self-serve card checkout.
You can provision, align, monitor, and pool.
One standard, across the programme.
One standard held
Share one rubric and the same integrity signals. The score is not an official grade.
See usage, quality, and integrity bands. Insights do not name a learner.
Size a credit pool for the programme. Student wallets stay separate.
Onboarding covers roles, assignments, and what Acadomic does not do.
The programme sees the pattern, not a named student.
01 · Seats
Provision the organisation
Invite faculty into the organisation, set who administers the pool, and size scan limits to the department.
02 · Rubric
Share one formative standard
The same rubric-aligned notes and AI-use signals run on every draft in the workspace. The score is not an official grade.
03 · Cohort
Watch the faculty, not one inbox
Dashboards show plagiarism signals, rubric patterns, and usage for the cohort. Individual learner names stay off that view.
04 · Pool
Run on a credit pool
Allocate the pool for the programme, with a named contact for the pilot and for data-processing questions.